Why Does the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Upload Federal Sensitive Data into Ai with Urgency?

Abstract

This article uses publicly available information from diverse news media to examine the reasons for DOGE’s urgent push to implement artificial intelligence (AI) and incorporate sensitive federal data to assess government efficiency. By analyzing systemic patterns at various levels (including first, second, and third-order patterns and our interpretation of hidden ones), we identify crucial factors behind this initiative, such as power centralization, government restructuring, cultural transformation, and the relationship between AI and public administration. Additionally, we “reconstruct” the potential data structure DOGE employs—drawing from the sources mentioned before and the AI model it likely uses to achieve its objectives.

 Context 

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) marks a significant shift in federal governance. It showcases (figure below) a primary pattern of cost-cutting and technology-driven oversight, a secondary pattern of corporate-style governance replacing traditional bureaucratic structures, and a tertiary pattern of government evolving into a data-driven AI entity. Additionally, some media sources suggest underlying patterns that imply restructuring may fulfill ideological, financial, and political interests beyond mere government efficiency. This article does not evaluate the reasoning behind this implication, as it may be based on interpretations of perceived motivations. 

What do we mean by these types of patterns? 

In various fields, such as mathematics, statistics, and critical thinking, “first-order,” “second-order,” and “third-order” patterns refer to increasing levels of complexity in recognizing patterns or relationships. The first order represents the most basic and obvious pattern, while the subsequent orders involve analyzing the patterns within patterns or considering more subtle interactions and long-term effects.

That said, Elon Musk's figure below provides insight into DOGE’s initiatives related to spending, waste, and fraud. Notably, the Real Increase (Net $, %) metric compares spending growth from 2019 to 2024, adjusted for inflation. 

Additionally, the figure below highlights the General Accountability Office’s (GAO) analysis of inefficiencies across federal agencies, reinforcing a key narrative of governance reengineering.

At the same time, major media outlets have reported on DOGE’s extensive use of AI, raising concerns about the legal and ethical implications of automated decision-making in government.

Proposing Government Reforms is Nothing New

Previous government reform efforts, such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Committee on Administrative Management (1936), the Grace Commission (1980s), and the National Partnership for Reinventing Government (1990s), relied on traditional management and human analysis. DOGE signifies an AI-driven paradigm shift that surpasses earlier efficiency measures by integrating automation and predictive modeling into government decision-making. Additionally, DOGE introduces a Silicon Valley-style cultural shift that prioritizes speed, disruption, and an entrepreneurial mindset, contrasting with the historically methodical nature of government reform.

First-Order Impact: Direct AI Implementation

DOGE’s AI strategy operates on three levels:

  • Data Collection: Extracting information from agencies such as Education, Health and Human Services, and Defense.
  • Analysis: Identifying inefficiencies, fraud, and policy misalignment using AI algorithms.
  • Automation & Recommendations: Implementing AI-driven optimizations, with a growing emphasis on automated government decision-making and potentially replacing human roles.

A recent report states: “DOGE is using AI software through Microsoft’s Azure cloud computing service to scrutinize every federal dollar spent, from contracts to travel expenses.”

In addition to AI, DOGE’s approach mirrors the disruptive business models of Silicon Valley startups, such as Uber’s regulatory bypass strategy. Rather than methodically implementing reform, DOGE’s leadership treats government bureaucracy as an inefficient system that needs rapid overhaul, disregarding entrenched processes and potential short-term consequences.

Second-Order Impact: Corporate-Style Governance & Power Consolidation

Leadership

Elon Musk is a “special government employee,” allowing up to 130 days of service per year under different ethics rules than regular federal employees. His dual role as a private tech entrepreneur and a government official creates potential conflicts of interest, particularly in AI procurement, cloud computing partnerships, and data monetization.

Operational Teams

DOGE deploys small teams within federal agencies, typically composed of:

  • A lead
  • An engineer
  • An HR specialist
  • A lawyer

These teams function like “SWAT units,” tackling inefficiencies in each department. They resemble corporate intervention teams rather than traditional bureaucratic offices.

Mission-Oriented Divisions

  • Software Modernization Unit: Engineers work to streamline government IT systems.
  • Regulatory Rescission: Identifying and eliminating unnecessary regulations.
  • Cost Reduction Taskforce: Targeting waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending.

Executive and Legislative Engagement

White House Office: DOGE operates within the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, reflecting a centralization of government decision-making power.

Congressional Outreach: Works with caucuses like the Delivering Outstanding Government Efficiency Caucus to support reforms.

Third-Order Impact: AI as the Future of Bureaucracy

The Urgency Behind DOGE’s AI Implementation

The administration aims to enact reforms before the 2026 midterm elections, anticipating legal challenges that may stall AI-driven governance transformations. Additionally, as per its founding executive order, DOGE’s mandate expires on July 4, 2026.

Future of Government Operations

AI-driven automation fundamentally alters government operations, setting a precedent for an AI-managed public sector. The drive for AI-enhanced predictive governance means policymaking shifts from human discretion to algorithmic decision systems. The cultural transformation towards a tech-first, data-first model also prioritizes disruption over process, presenting a significant departure from past reforms.

AI and Sensitive Data: Strategic Justification

Hidden Patterns in AI and Data Use

Beyond efficiency goals, DOGE’s approach suggests several underlying trends:

  • Privatization of Public Data: AI models require extensive datasets, potentially creating opportunities for private entities, including Musk’s companies, to access or manage government data.
  • Political Ideological Shifts: AI-driven governance may prioritize decision-making models that favor particular ideological viewpoints, potentially influencing policy beyond traditional democratic oversight.
  • Consolidation of Power: AI centralization under DOGE reduces transparency, as algorithmic decision-making is often opaque and difficult for the public to challenge.
  • Corporate-Government Nexus: DOGE’s partnerships with private-sector AI firms, including Microsoft, raise concerns about preferential contracts and monopolization of AI-powered governance tools.

Why AI?

  • AI enables faster and broader pattern recognition in budget allocation, fraud detection, and regulatory efficiency.
  • AI enhances decision-making by analyzing large datasets beyond human capability.
  • Automation replaces bureaucratic inefficiencies, leading to workforce restructuring in federal agencies.

However, AI requires access to sensitive government data, raising legal and ethical concerns over data security, biases, and the role of automated decision-making.

Required AI Input Data and Models 

DOGE integrates (our inference) diverse datasets for AI-driven decision-making:

Data Categories

  • Structured Data: Financial records, HR metrics, procurement contracts.
  • Unstructured Data: Policy documents, internal communications.
  • Operational Metrics: Workflow performance, service delivery times.
  • Multi-Modal Data: Text, images, geographic data.
  • Real-Time Feeds: Fraud detection, budget anomaly tracking.
  • Metadata & Contextual Data: Tags, timestamps, and source identifiers.

AI Capabilities Employed

  • Natural Language Processing (NLP): Document analysis, policy review automation.
  • Predictive Analytics: Budget forecasting, anomaly detection.
  • Robotic Process Automation (RPA): Automating repetitive administrative tasks.
  • Multi-Modal AI: Combining diverse data sources for holistic decision-making.

Conclusion: The Future of AI-Governed Public Administration

DOGE’s AI-driven initiative marks a fundamental shift in government structure, mirroring corporate efficiency and AI automation models. While AI enhances oversight and cost-cutting, its implications for democratic accountability, government transparency, and citizen rights remain contentious.

The integration of hidden patterns—privatization, ideological shifts, and consolidation of power—suggests that DOGE’s role extends beyond mere efficiency. As DOGE moves towards its 2026 deadline, its legacy may serve as a precedent for an AI-powered federal government, raising crucial questions about automation, governance, and the role of human oversight in policymaking.

References

Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483-500.

The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/02/06/elon-musk-doge-ai-department-education/

Implementing The President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Workforce Optimization Initiative, Executive Order  February 11, 2025: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/implementing-the-presidents-department-of-government-efficiency-workforce-optimization-initiative/

Establishing and implementing the President’s "Department of Government Efficiency, Executive Order” January 20, 2025: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/establishing-and-implementing-the-presidents-department-of-government-efficiency/

The Conversation: https://theconversationus.cmail20.com/t/r-e-thykiiht-otyjuukirr-r/

Colin Gordon, Professor of History, University of Iowa: Trump’s Project 2025 agenda caps decades-long resistance to 20th-century progressive reform. February 3, 2025. https://theconversation.com/trumps-project-2025-agenda-caps-decades-long-resistance-to-20th-century-progressive-reform-247176?utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=bylinecopy_url_buttonLunn

Tracking the Legal Showdown Over Trump’s Executive Orders: https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/tracking-the-legal-challenges-to-trumps-executive-orders

3Claud: https://3cloudsolutions.com/resources/the-power-of-ai-data-analytics/#:~:text=To%20use%20AI%20for%20data,better%20than%20each%20could%20alone!

Counting Regulations: An Overview of Rulemaking, Types of Federal Regulations, and Pages in the Federal Register, Congressional Research Service. September 3, 2019: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R43056.pdf

Elon Musk’s DOGE Is Working on a Custom Chatbot Called GSAi, WIRED. Feb 6, 2025: https://www.wired.com/story/doge-chatbot-ai-first-agenda/?_sp=8e4a4321-8c0b-4b44-9cd4-e262fd54a31b.1738938461776

AI in Government: A Strategic Framework for Digital Transformation, February 5, 2025: https://www.reisystems.com/ai-in-government-a-strategic-framework-for-digital-transformation/

AI for bureaucratic productivity: Measuring the potential of AI to help automate 143 million UK government transactions, 18 Mar 2024: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14712

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com

In chaotic Washington blitz, Elon Musk’s ultimate goal becomes clear, 8 February 2025: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/02/08/doge-musk-goals/

POLITICO's Digital Future Daily, By Derek Robertson, February 13, 2025: https://www.politico.com/newsletters/digital-future-daily/2025/02/13/doge-washington-silicon-valley-politics-rohit-krishnan-musk-00204140



Comentarios

Entradas populares